Transparency / meetings
Ted Neitzke: The transparency commitment and the later records ruling
Promise vs outcome
Exact statement
“We will prioritize accountability and transparency every step of the way.” [1]
Ted Neitzke, Official letter from Mayor Neitzke to City of Port Washington residents, January 8, 2025
Neitzke made the commitment while presenting a potential data-center project and explaining the conditions under which the City would pursue an agreement.[2][3]
What the record shows
Wisconsin CCAP identifies the matter as Ozaukee County case 2025CV000521, Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, a petition for writ of mandamus assigned to Judge Adam Gerol.[4][5] At the January 28, 2026 motion hearing, Gerol denied the City's motion to quash and dismiss; the reported basis was that the City's response was incomplete because the requested communications included their email attachments.[6][7][8]
“There has not been a complete response to the open records request. For that reason alone, the motion (to dismiss the case) is not properly supported.” [8]
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit, January 28, 2026
Context
The dispute concerned whether a request for communications included email attachments that the City had not produced.[9][10] Gerol said the emails and attachments had to be viewed together as the complete communication.[7] Gerol did not issue the requested writ at that hearing; the court record says a factual record was still required and that another hearing was set.[11][12] As of October 10, 2026, the court record lists the case as open, with a hearing scheduled for October 15, 2026.[13][14]
Analysis
The January 2025 statement promised accountability and transparency “every step of the way.”[15] At the January 28, 2026 hearing in the records case, the court denied the City's motion to quash and dismiss after finding the response incomplete because attachments were part of the requested communications.[16][17][8] The contrast is institutional rather than proof that Neitzke personally handled the request; Wisconsin Watch reported that he said he was not part of the records-release process.[18] The January 28 ruling also did not resolve whether a writ should issue or whether the City had ultimately complied, because Gerol said a factual record was required and set another hearing.[19][11]
Sources
Statement source
Potential For New Development - A Letter From Mayor Neitzke — City of Port Washington, Wisconsin
Pinpoint: Paragraph beginning “This could be a great opportunity for us”.
Record source
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Pinpoint: Paragraphs beginning “Gerol disagreed” and “There has not been a complete response”.
Every source on this page
Each numbered mark in the text links here. Every excerpt is quoted word for word from the source.
Potential For New Development - A Letter From Mayor Neitzke — City of Port Washington, Wisconsin
Where: Paragraph beginning “This could be a great opportunity for us”
“This could be a great opportunity for us. But we’ll only pursue an agreement that makes sense for our city and our residents. We will prioritize accountability and transparency every step of the way.”
Potential For New Development - A Letter From Mayor Neitzke — City of Port Washington, Wisconsin
Where: Paragraph beginning “We have been approached by a developer”
“We have been approached by a developer that specializes in identifying and developing sites for data centers.”
Potential For New Development - A Letter From Mayor Neitzke — City of Port Washington, Wisconsin
Where: Paragraph beginning “This could be a great opportunity for us”
“But we’ll only pursue an agreement that makes sense for our city and our residents. We will prioritize accountability and transparency every step of the way.”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Case header and Case summary
“Ozaukee County Case Number 2025CV000521 Lynde Uihlein vs. City of Port Washington”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Case summary, fields “Class code description” and “Responsible official”
“Class code description Petition for Writ of Mandamus Responsible official Gerol, Adam”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Court record, 01-28-2026 Motion hearing entry
“Respondent's motion to quash and dismiss petition heard. Arguments. Court makes findings and denies motion. Petitioner requests writ of mandamus. Court advises requires factual record. Court sets next hearing.”
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Where: Paragraph beginning “Gerol disagreed”
“I can’t see any distinction between the request for communications and attachments. That is the complete communication. That’s what’s being asked for. It must be viewed together.”
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Where: Paragraph beginning “There has not been a complete response”
“There has not been a complete response to the open records request. For that reason alone, the motion (to dismiss the case) is not properly supported.”
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Where: Paragraph beginning “At issue is whether”
“At issue is whether the city is required to turn over attachments to emails, she said.”
More than NDAs. Wisconsin communities face scrutiny over data center secrecy. — Wisconsin Watch
Where: Section “Port Washington stymies public records requests,” paragraph beginning “The city responded”
“The city responded by turning over emails, but not the documents attached to those emails, such as a draft development agreement.”
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Where: Paragraph beginning “However, Gerol stopped short”
“However, Gerol stopped short of issuing a writ to compel the city to produce the records, instead setting a Feb. 23 hearing to take testimony in the matter.”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Court record, 01-28-2026 Motion hearing entry
“Petitioner requests writ of mandamus. Court advises requires factual record. Court sets next hearing. Parties may appear via zoom.”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Case summary, "Case status" (viewed October 10, 2026)
“Open - Electronic filing”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Court record, Notice of hearing entry dated 07-14-2026
“Hearing on October 15, 2026 at 01:30 pm.”
Potential For New Development - A Letter From Mayor Neitzke — City of Port Washington, Wisconsin
Where: Paragraph beginning “This could be a great opportunity for us”
“We will prioritize accountability and transparency every step of the way.”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Court record, 01-28-2026 Motion hearing entry
“Respondent's motion to quash and dismiss petition heard. Arguments. Court makes findings and denies motion.”
Judge rejects city request to dismiss records lawsuit — Wisconsin Newspaper Association
Where: Paragraph beginning “Gerol disagreed”
“I can’t see any distinction between the request for communications and attachments. That is the complete communication.”
More than NDAs. Wisconsin communities face scrutiny over data center secrecy. — Wisconsin Watch
Where: Section “Another denial,” paragraph beginning “Neitzke said he could not comment”
“Neitzke said he could not comment on why the city has not turned over email attachments, other than to say he is not part of the process of releasing records.”
Lynde Uihlein v. City of Port Washington, Ozaukee County Case No. 2025CV000521 — case details and January 28, 2026 motion-hearing docket entry — Wisconsin Circuit Court Access
Where: Court record, 01-28-2026 Motion hearing entry
“Petitioner requests writ of mandamus. Court advises requires factual record. Court sets next hearing.”
Correction or added context
See an error or a fuller primary source? Both options below open a pre-addressed draft identifying this entry; this site does not collect or send form data.